08/06/12+ Share
Back in 1993, Stanley Hauerwas wrote a provocative essay with the playful title “Why Gays (as a Group) are Morally Superior to Christians (as a Group).” That essay, which is now available in the Hauerwas Reader, engaged the now settled debate about whether it was appropriate for those who claim to be homosexual to serve in the military. As someone who believes nonviolence is normative for Christians, Hauerwas found it interesting that a majority of the U.S. military back then did not think homosexuals would make very good warriors, but they all agreed Christians would.
Those who claim to follow Jesus—the same Jesus who broke down the wall between ethnic groups, who commanded his followers to love their enemies, who taught his followers nonviolent ways to handle conflict, and who demanded unswerving allegiance to a kingdom that transcends national borders—were, and continue to be, deemed perfectly fit for violent combat against anyone the U.S. identifies as an enemy who needs to be killed or otherwise subjugated.
Hauerwas’ point, of course, has little to do with the topic of homosexuality as such. He simply wishes that Christians would be numbered among those who are deemed unfit for violent combat on account of their specific orientation. Since being moral entails, for Hauerwas, refusing to kill people at the behest of the state, he pointedly suggests that homosexuals had a better reputation than Christians in that particular department.
The lesbian gay bisexual transgender (hereafter LGBT) community has since successfully convinced the state of its equal ability to perform whatever tasks the military may request of it. Having done so, they have abdicated the moral high ground Hauerwas attributed to them. Nonetheless, two decades later his essay still informs how Christians might think about the hot topics of our day. In particular, I have in mind the currently debate surrounding the commitment of members and friends of the LGBT community to boycott the Chick-fil-A restaurant on account of recent statements made by its president, Dan Cathy, that go against the grain of their worldview. Two interesting commentaries on this debate are offered by Branson Parler and Chris Smith.
Like Hauerwas, I will entirely dodge the issue of what properly constitutes marriage and what the church’s stance toward certain LGBT practices might be. Instead I, too, see the majority of Christians occupying the moral low ground in comparison with the LGBT community when it comes to aligning its economic and recreational habits with its strongest convictions. If a particular franchise wants to take a strong stance that violates LGBT sensibilities, they are willing to deny patronage to that franchise. By contrast, a majority of Christians have been quite willing to shop at stores whose CEO’s motives are twisted, to eat from restaurants that offer unreasonably low wages or profit from the abuse of animals, and to benefit from cheap overseas laborers who are treated inhumanely.
Of course, not all in the LGBT community care much about who they support by where they shop and what they eat. Likewise, there are plenty of Christians who are quite deliberate about their shopping and eating habits and take note of who is benefiting and suffering from the production and distribution of certain goods and services. That is why the title of this essay, like that of Hauerwas’ essay, includes the important qualifier “as a group.” Neither of us is making an absolute statement about all people who claim to be Christian or LGBT.
I am also bothered that Christians in America keep getting wrapped up in intra-American squabbles about who has what specks of sawdust in their eyes, while that very dispute exposes the logs we have protruding from our own. Christian apathy toward whom we support with our resources is a larger problem for the church than how pagans wish to rearrange the furniture on their sinking ship.
By this I mean that the American Constitution is a temporary charter for a temporary political configuration that Scripture clearly teaches will be re-colonized by God’s eternal kingdom—a kingdom in which Jesus says there will be no marriage at all.
What, then, should Christians do? Here I employ a typology I’ve culled from John Howard Yoder’s essay, “The Original Revolution.” This instructive typology draws from various groups during Jesus’ time. When Jesus arrived on the scene he was not the only Jew with a position on how to engage issues of public and political significance. The Zealots, Essenes, Sadducees, and Pharisees all advocated distinct approaches that Jesus could have endorsed, but did not.
The Zealots were rebels against the existing pagan order. They wanted to see God’s kingdom come and they were willing to storm the gates of Jerusalem to take the empire by force. They were attracted to Jesus’ message of revolution, but were impatient with his methods and timing.
A Zealot approach to a public institution whose values conflict with theirs would probably include vandalism of the institution’s buildings and threats to the families connected with the organization.
The Essenes took the opposite approach. They believed that all the public institutions were corrupt and built their own self-sustaining segregated community in the desert by the Dead Sea. They were a “make your own Chick-fil-A at home” sort of people.
An Essene approach to rival public institutions would be to avoid them altogether. To participate in corruption in any form would be to compromise their own purity, which would jeopardize their status as the elect community that God will use to reform the world when he comes to establish his kingdom.
The Sadducees had no such qualms about purity. They wanted God’s people to make a positive impact on the world and that meant finding ways to partner with all respectable public institutions. They met the powerbrokers of society on their own terms so they could carve out a place for themselves among them. In Jesus’ day that meant partnering with the Roman Empire so they could at least have their own temple and interests represented in Jerusalem.
Their approach to institutions that conflicted with their values would be to assess the impact that various ways of interacting with them may have on their own aims. If partnering with them would be advantageous, they would get their hands dirty for the sake of the cause. If it would hurt their cause, they would abstain.
The Pharisees, like the Essenes, were also concerned with purity. Yet they were most interested in impacting the masses around them and strove for purity among the common people, rather than separate from them. Since they lived among corruption and were necessarily affiliated with it in one way or another, they took a dualistic stance that distinguished between outer actions and inner dispositions. They could either interact with corrupt organizations bodily as long as their inner thoughts remained pure, or they could abstain from obviously inappropriate outward behaviors, like stealing, while inwardly coveting their neighbor’s possessions.
Modern day Pharisees might outwardly participate in activities of corrupt institutions while inwardly disapproving what they stand for. Or they could abstain from public association with those institutions, while acquiring their goods in a less conspicuous way.
Jesus rejected all four approaches. He knew that the Jerusalem establishment was corrupt, yet he made no attempt to (a) overthrow it violently like a Zealot, (b) align with it strategically like a Sadducee, (c) isolate himself from it altogether like an Essene, or (d) avoid blatant association with corruption like a Pharisee while enjoying more subtle forms of corruption among the common country folk.
Instead, Jesus resisted temptation in the desert, corruption in the city, and manipulation among the masses, all the while spending time in desert, city, and country without getting caught up in the power plays of those various terrains. He refused to play the world’s game on the world’s terms and began forming a community who would embody the wholesome life of God’s kingdom.
Today, Jesus would likely avoid gravitating toward the politically correct positions of the right or left. He wouldn’t get sucked into polarizing options whose shared goal is to rule the masses with their unique philosophy. Jesus rejected the temptation to rule over the masses and chose to serve them by being and doing for each what was in their best interests.
When one Pharisee sought him out sincerely, he had a frank conversation with him. When other Pharisees tried to trap him, he exposed their duplicity. When the Pharisees and Sadducees brought their petty debates to him to suck him into their game, he changed the rules and helped both see how limited their own perspectives were. When instruction was offered in Jerusalem, the young Jesus lingered longer (than his parents) to glean as much as he could from its teachers. But when the temple was turned into a marketing scheme, he prophetically turned the tables and exposed the corruption.
For Jesus, each situation was a unique new opportunity, not a pre-scripted scene with media-induced pre-determined responses. He relied on the Spirit’s guidance to discern how best to engage each new person and situation and he used each opportunity to draw his neighbors closer to a proper understanding of God’s kingdom.
So instead of assuming that Dan Cathy must be right because he is a Christian who affirms the orthodox vision of marriage or that the LGBT community must be wrong because they are morally suspect, are attacking America’s ideal of free speech, and transcending the separation of religion and commerce, perhaps we should take our cues from Hauerwas and Jesus: we should refuse to get sucked in to the world’s debate on the world’s terms. We should allow both sincere businessmen and morally suspect persons to teach God’s people about honoring our convictions and integrating them into the various spheres of our lives.
Will we be bold enough like Cathy to proclaim our convictions at the risk of retaliation? Will we have the integrity of the LGBT community to put our money behind our convictions and to abstain from food we might enjoy as a prophetic statement against values that grate against our core convictions?
Do we affirm that the freedom to articulate our core convictions as a gift granted us by God and sealed by the blood of his son, or do we accept the nationalistic narrative that it was won on the battlefields of America and enshrined in the Constitution?
Could Christians show themselves to be morally superior for a change by resisting the urge to play the world’s game on the world’s terms and by offering them a new perspective that draws them closer to a proper understanding of God’s kingdom?
http://www.walkandword.com/blog/11/10/2016
This November, Great Lakes Christian College hosted its first annual Restoration Appreciation Week. The event was designed to foster…
06/09/2016
With an official publication date of May 31, Endangered Gospel is finally here!
You can purchase a copy from the publisher and even read…
05/24/2016
I have a new website up to promote the forthcoming "Endangered Gospel" book. It includes a blog that I will contribute to somewhat…
04/05/2016
How should Christians really think about war? Too often we are led to believe there are only two options:
* Pacifist Idealism: war is…
02/01/2016
Many of you know I wrote a book over my sabbatical last Spring. Well the book is finally in the hands of the publisher and should be…
09/15/2015
It’s been 16 years and The Matrix is still my favorite movie. One of the most memorable scenes is Neo’s encounter with Spoon…
08/27/2015
At the July gathering of The Ekklesia Project I presented a paper about baptism and how it impacts how churches disciple their youth. This…
04/15/2015
I am honored to be close friends with a family that loves the Lord enough to welcome a child into this world who had no chance of…
07/22/2014
Tired of browsing social media and failing to find something that actually engages and enriches your mind?
Think Christian stands…
07/04/2014
A timely excerpt from John Howard Yoder:
“All men are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights,” according to…
07/01/2014
I've begun writing a commentary on Genesis for a new series: Polis Bible Commentary. This series pairs a Bible scholar with an urban…
06/30/2014
Those of you who have kept up on my writing projects know that I've been working on a three volume series of easy to read material written…
06/02/2014
This is a book review I wrote about Chris Smith and John Pattison's Slow Church (IVP 2014). I liked the book a lot because it provides…
12/18/2013
These are the top 10 most influential books in my life.
1. Phil Kenneson’s Life on the Vine (discovered ~1999)
* I’ve…
08/26/2013
Many of you have made use of the fill-in-the-blank “Story of the Bible” resource that I use in class and share on my website. I…
08/13/2013
The Ekklesia Project has posted on their website podcasts of all sessions from last month's conference ""Practicing the Peace of…
07/12/2013
Why would a loving God flood the earth? How could a God of peace sanction such widespread violence?
I just added the sermon I…
05/28/2013
In his May 23 speech on national security, President Obama claimed that America’s current war against al-Qaida is a just war.…
05/23/2013
Kingdom language is back on the map as a way of talking about the gospel and the church’s mission. It is now time to tighten up our…
04/16/2013
It has been a while since I’ve blogged, but a lot has been happening in my work in Yoder studies. Here is an update and as a bonus…
01/21/2013
Below are two excerpts from a sermon John Howard Yoder preached the day after Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated. The first is short…
12/23/2012
What do the birth stories mean when they announce that Jesus came to "save his people from their sins"? Back then, "his people" did not…
11/13/2012
I really wanted to be done with the Elections and Idolatry series, but my wife Beth didn’t like the way it ended. She did not think I…
11/11/2012
1. It's on sale nearly 33% off at the publisher and on Amazon, and it almost Christmas!
11/02/2012
The Power of a Priestly Kingdom
In parts 1 and 2 of this blog series I have sought to locate today’s presidential race in a wider…
10/31/2012
Answering a Fundamental Objection
In part one, I expressed my increasing discomfort with voting in certain elections. I grounded this…
10/29/2012
Nationalism, Elections, and Idolatry
I have been reluctant to vote in national elections for as long as I can remember. My reasons were…
10/21/2012
We are one month away from the long-awaited release of Radical Christian Discipleship. This is the first of three volumes that make…
09/26/2012
I am pleased to announce that we have sold enough copies of The Politics of Yahweh that Amazon.com converted it to Kindle format.
This…
09/04/2012
Stanley Being Stanley
Sojourners online recently posted a quote from Stanley Hauerwas that has me thinking about apologetics again. It…
08/29/2012
My brother-in-law Jamie tipped me off to a neat way some believers have chosen to engage the forthcoming Election Day as Christians and not…
08/06/2012
Back in 1993, Stanley Hauerwas wrote a provocative essay with the playful title “Why Gays (as a Group) are Morally Superior to…
06/24/2012
I am in the middle of editing the full draft and simply had to share a glimpse with you all.
"How would Christians be different if they…
05/29/2012
"[Theology is not] a realm of free search where everyone is free to think whatever he or she wants and where the last resort is simply how…
05/23/2012
Through facebook and google survey tools, over 100 people (most of whom are probably reading this) helped the editors and publishers select…
05/22/2012
Whenever people contact me for resources that they remember using in class at some point, I add those resources to the resources tab of the…
04/30/2012
I haven't blogged much this Spring and some of you have asked for an update, so here goes:
1. I received my first royalties check for a…
03/23/2012
Branson Parler has recently written a devastating critique of Paul Martens' new book, The Heterodox Yoder. Though I appreciate what…
03/19/2012
The End of Sacrifice has received decent press over the past few weeks. Chris Smith wrote a brief review for the Englewood Review of…
02/14/2012
Here is a sermon I delivered at GLCC a few years ago and then again recently at Delta Community Christian Church. It unpacks the abiding…
01/04/2012
"It would follow that there is no point at which a renewed recourse to the apostolic writings and their point to Jesus cannot renew us. In…
01/01/2012
In my first blog of 2012 I want to thank Chris Smith and the Englewood Review of Books [ERB] for the exposure they have given my work and…
12/16/2011
Is the work of Christ truly sufficient to meet humanity's deepest needs? No book of the Bible grapples with this question more than…
12/05/2011
Yes, my new book is out, and yes it retails for a hefty $30. But the publishers have graciously given me a coupon code that I can make…
11/11/2011
The Politics of Yahweh, the book that came out of my dissertation, is finally printed and scheduled to be available for purchase later…
11/07/2011
Almost a year ago, I wrote a lengthy informal review article for the Englewood Review of Books that engaged Peter J. Leithart's…
10/10/2011
Join Branson Parler, Jason Vance, and I as we commemorate the culmination of more than a year's work to get the John Howard Yoder Index…
09/25/2011
For those of you interested in contemporary conversations about war, enemy love, and Christian faith, there are two books you may want to…
09/24/2011
My second book editing project is finally finished, on the shelves, and ready to own! Herald Press just released "The End of Sacrifice: The…
09/08/2011
When Peter J. Leithart published "Defending Constantine," the initial response was overwhelmingly positive. Stanley Hauerwas' mostly…
08/28/2011
Some of you have read the article I posted a while back entitled "With and Against the Grain: Stanley Hauerwas and the Tumultuous Tale of…
08/23/2011
It may come as a surprise to some that Orbis Press recently published John Howard Yoder: Spiritual Writings in their Modern…
08/05/2011
I have been reading through all of John Howard Yoder's books as part of The Yoder Index Project. Those of you who want to keep up with all…
07/30/2011
Thanks to Rob Bell's controversial book, Love Wins, the relationship between God's love and God's wrath is once again a hot topic.…
06/04/2011
To do:
*Provide students, former students, church leaders with resources that I have found helpful for thinking and teaching about…
06/03/2011
The first major mistake of my fledgling publishing career was to name the first book I edited Radical Ecumenicity. Apparently, not many…
06/03/2011
Two years ago I was invited by former students, now co-laborers for the kingdom, to attend what has become the annual “Outhouse…